Production and Management
Key Points:
- Cow comfort management and the availability and quality of feed are the most
critical factors in getting a good milk response to POSILAC®.
- To measure a substantial difference in the bulk tank, at least
30 to 40 percent of the herd needs to be receiving POSILAC.
- Healthy
cows should be started on POSILAC beginning 57-70 days in milk.
- There
is no correlation between body condition score and milk production response to
POSILAC.
POSILAC bovine somatotropin can be
utilized in all healthy cows beginning 57-70 days in milk. The increase in milk
yield following injection is rapid (Figure 1) with the maximum increase in milk
occurring after about three to four injections. Milk yield responses average 10
pounds per supplemented cow per day. Figure 1 Schematic
illustration showing 14-day cycle of POSILAC response It is not possible to select individual cows that respond to POSILAC,
since it is impossible to know what the milk yield would have been without the
injection. All healthy cows, beginning 57-70 days in milk, are good candidates
for POSILAC. In addition to increasing milk yield immediately, feed intake also
increases, although this may lag behind the increase in milk by several weeks.
The increased nutrient intake is used both to support the increased milk production
and to replenish body reserves in the cow (Figure 2).1 Figure
1 Effects of POSILAC bovine somatotropin In the U.S., POSILAC has been utilized in commercial
herds with herd averages ranging from 14,500 to 27,000 lbs/year (Table 1).2
There is little relationship between the lactation increase due to POSILAC and
the herd average. Table 1 Milk yield responses (%
or lbs/cow/day) to administration of POSILAC bovine somatotropin (12 weeks)
on 29 commercial farms in 10 states
| State | Rolling
herd average (lbs) | Milking
times/day | Total herd size | Number
of cows on trial | Before
POSILAC (lbs/cow/day) | Increase
during 12 weeks POSILAC (lbs/cow/day) | Increase |
| Michigan | | Farm
1 | 16,149 | 2X | 252 | 72 | 56.1 | 15.2 | 27.1% |
| Farm 2 | 20,805 | 2X | 189 | 59 | 66.6 | 12.0 | 18.0% |
| Farm 3 | 17,712 | 2X | 251 | 79 | 65.6 | 13.0 | 19.8% |
| Farm 4 | 17,641 | 2X | 148 | 50 | 63.8 | 8.6 | 13.5% |
| New York | | Farm
1 | 20,500 | 3X | 260 | 75 | 78.6 | 18.5 | 23.5% |
| Farm 2 | 18,500 | 3X | 600 | 70 | 69.3 | 14.3 | 20.6% |
| Farm 3 | 21,794 | 3X | 221 | 46 | 66.9 | 10.3 | 15.4% |
| Utah | | Farm
1 | 17,160 | 2X | 183 | 49 | 56.3 | 12.2 | 21.7% |
| Farm 2 | 19,344 | 2X | 170 | 50 | 54.5 | 11.1 | 20.4% |
| Farm 3 | 19,449 | 2X | 150 | 53 | 73.3 | 11.7 | 16.0% |
| Colorado | | Farm
1 | 18,000 | 3X | 275 | 76 | 68.1 | 9.9 | 14.5% |
| Farm 2 | 22,093 | 3X | 295 | 75 | 78.0 | 11.8 | 15.1% |
| Florida | | Farm
1 | 18,900 | 3X | 1,438 | 139 | 69.5 | 14.7 | 21.1% |
| Farm 2 | 14,791 | 2X | 900 | 51 | 59.4 | 7.3 | 12.3% |
| Maryland | | Farm
1 | 17,966 | 2X | 230 | 44 | 57.7 | 7.9 | 13.7% |
| Farm 2 | 15,740 | 2X | 175 | 32 | 54.0 | 10.4 | 19.3% |
| Idaho | | Farm
1 | 25,500 | 3X | 545 | 46 | 87.4 | 13.0 | 14.9% |
| California | | Farm
1 | 18,940 | 2X | 1,055 | 148 | 71.2 | 9.4 | 13.2% |
| Farm 2 | 18,600 | 2X | 1,087 | 197 | 68.0 | 14.0 | 20.6% |
| Farm 3 | 17,200 | 2X | 954 | 195 | 67.7 | 8.1 | 12.0% |
| Arizona | | Farm
1 | 18,800 | 2X | 1,400 | 84 | 64.0 | 9.8 | 15.3% |
| Farm 2 | 19,000 | 2X | 750 | 78 | 62.9 | 8.4 | 13.4% |
| Farm 3 | 17,200 | 2X | 1,500 | 84 | 65.4 | 9.7 | 14.8% |
| Farm 4 | 17,931 | 2X | 659 | 65 | 65.0 | 13.2 | 20.3% |
| Farm 5 | 24,700 | 4X | 814 | 199 | 89.6 | 8.6 | 9.6% |
| Farm 6* | 11,510 | 2X | 551 | 88 | 53.4 | 11.6 | 21.7% |
| Pennsylvania | | Farm
1 | 19,860 | 2X | 111 | 37 | 73.5 | 7.0 | 9.5% |
| Farm 2 | 16,684 | 2X | 45 | 20 | 57.0 | 5.7 | 10.0% |
| Farm 3 | 15,326 | 2X | 130 | 37 | 57.3 | 11.3 | 19.7% |
| * Jersey Breed | Heifers
and mature cows can respond well to POSILAC, although overall heifer response
tends to be slightly lower (Table 2). The genetic potential of the cows for milk
production is not related to its responsiveness to POSILAC, i.e. genetically superior
Holsteins respond in a similar manner to average Holsteins.
Table 2 Milk yield responses (lbs/cow/day) to POSILAC (500 mg) administration
for 252 days in heifers and cows
| Studies | Heifers | Cows |
| 4 site dose determination study | 7.7 | 8.6 |
| IM/SC injection site study | 9.5 | 15.8 |
Cows will enter into a POSILAC program at the rate of
about 2 percent of the herd per week (assuming a uniform calving pattern). To
measure a substantial difference in the bulk tank, at least 30% to 40% of the
herd needs to be receiving POSILAC at any given time, and this will take four
months to achieve. Alternatively, the monthly DHIA records of individual cows
can be assessed. However, care must be taken in their interpretation given the
day-to-day variation in the milk yields of individual cows and that the normal
decline of the underlying lactation curve is about 10 percent per month. Although
it would be desirable to pre-select cows that would respond maximally to supplementation
with POSILAC bovine somatotropin, there is no way to do this. Generally, provided
a cow is healthy and not emaciated, then it should be started on POSILAC beginning
at 57 - 70 days of lactation. There is no correlation between body condition score
and milk production response to POSILAC. However, longer term herd performance
is associated with body condition score, particularly at the start of the next
lactation. At the initiation of the administration of POSILAC, cows may lose some
body condition (1/4 to 1/2 Body Condition Score Point) until the dry matter intake
increases to support the increased milk production. Long-term responses
are influenced by the dry matter intake, so focus should be on the availability
of feed at all times. General management recommendations can be summarized as
follows: - Cows should not be overcrowded.
- Ventilation should
be adequate. Supplemental ventilation or evaporative cooling may be desirable.
- Flooring should provide adequate traction without danger of stone bruises.
- Muddy areas should be cleaned and/or eliminated.
- Feeder and
feeding areas should be designed to make it easy for cows to eat.
- Keep
feed bunks clean to avoid moldy feed buildup.
- Clean potable water in
adequate amounts should be provided at all times. Additional water supplies may
be required.
- High-quality forages should be fed.
- In hot weather,
cows must be protected from the effects of heat. Adequate shade should be provided.
- Fly control is imperative.
References
- Hartnell GF, Franson SE, Bauman DE, Head HH, et al: Long-term evaluation
of sometribove, recombinant methionyl bovine somatotropin, in a prolonged release
system in lactating dairy cows-production responses in a dose titration study.
J Dairy Sci 1991;74:2645.
- Thomas JW, Erdman RA, Gallon DM, Lamb
RC, et al: Responses by lactating cows in commercial dairy herds to recombinant
bovine somatotropin. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:945
For
more information, read Adoption of Agricultural Technologies
and the Economics of bST
PRINT
THIS PAGE
|